The corporate takeover of the human body

Manufactured virus
The Roots of Evil | In conversation with Vera Sharav – Dr Reiner Fuellmich

Dr Rath has shown in his video below, the history of the chemicals/pharmaceuticals cartel’s influence through the two world wars, and to the inception and total control of Europe through the EU Commission since the Lisbon Treaty of 2009. He says that patents are the weapons with which the chemicals and drug cartel has organised its third attempt at world conquest. His website is and because of his views the industry shills oppose him, certainly via because he promotes natural remedies for cancer. The pharmaceutical industry is so greedy, that it doesn’t like competition from anywhere else and does its best to demonise the organic and natural sector. From his biography on this website

Dr. Rath, born in Stuttgart, Germany, comes from a modest background. His parents were farmers who passed their humanitarian values on to their children. After graduating from medical school Dr. Rath worked as a physician and researcher at the University Clinic of Hamburg, Germany and the German Heart Center in Berlin. His research focused on the causes of arteriosclerosis and cardiovascular disease.

In 1987, Dr. Rath discovered the connection between vitamin C deficiency and a new risk factor for heart disease – lipoprotein(a). After publication of these research findings in the American Heart Association journal “Arteriosclerosis,” Dr. Rath accepted an invitation to join two-time Nobel Laureate Linus Pauling. In 1990 he went to the United States to become the first Director of Cardiovascular Research at the Linus Pauling Institute in Palo Alto, California.

The two scientists became close personal friends who shared common humanistic values, including their determination for peace and justice. Shortly before his death in 1994, Dr. Pauling stated that Dr. Rath’s discoveries would later be seen among the most important of the 20th century.

What we are seeing today since the technocratic global takeover through the COVID plandemic, is that they have used fear to control the populations in each country, through mainstream media. They are perpetuating the story that we can only be safe if we let them further poison us with their chemicals/pharmaceutical creations! It really is time to realise that our bodies do not need their synthesised chemicals and whatever else they are putting into these so called vaccines, which are really treatments. They are calling them vaccines because that gives them impunity against any legal challenges. So many lies are used to roll out their agenda to depopulate and control the world.

In the second world war Jews and others were discriminated against and treated inhumanely and described here by Vera Sharav, the video is mainly in English although the title is in German. As a child, Vera was forced to wear a “yellow star” in Nazi Germany. She explains the close parallels with what’s happening now.

Here is a good article about Klaus Schwab

You have to dig for the truth on the adverse reactions and deaths from these vaccines. Here is some research posted on FB:

EudraVigilance: ‘Flu Jab Comparison

“One of the major limitations of the EudraVigilance European database for suspected adverse drug reaction reports is that entry is not mandatory for vaccine products. The same is true of the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting (VAERS) system of the CDC, an audit of which revealed that around 1 in 100 adverse reactions are voluntarily recorded. We have no idea of just how many adverse reactions to vaccines there are each year. This prompted me to compare performance of the four COVID-19 vaccines under trial with performance from seasonal and non-seasonal influenza products being products that, according to the OECD influenza vaccination rate indicator, achieve 40% market penetration each year for the target population of the elderly and infirm. These products are supplied by six manufacturers (AstraZeneca, CSL ltd, GlaxoSmithKline, Mylan, Novartis and Sanofi Pasteur) under 35 brand names from Aflunov to Vaxigrip Tetra.All 35 brand name entries were sought within EudraVigilance and the total number of adverse reactions was derived for the 12 month period ending 27th March 2021. In sum a grand total of 3,115 adverse reactions were reported for a vaccine that achieves 40% market penetration on average. In comparison a total of 238,949 adverse reactions were reported for the four COVID-19 products currently under trial over the same period. I have no idea what the average market penetration of COVID-19 product vaccination is across Europe but it’s not likely to be greater than 50%. We may conclude that the adverse reaction reporting rate for all four COVID-19 vaccination products is currently running at 76.7 times the rate reported for influenza vaccination products. This is quite extraordinary. Medical authorities, government agencies and governments across Europe persistently claim that COVID-19 vaccination products have undergone rigorous testing and are safe to unleash on the public. The hard data tells us otherwise.”

Our bodies have innate intelligence but we have to care for them, and not delegate responsibility to those whose wish to profit from us, as in the chemicals/drug cartels and their minions. The corporate takeover of medicine was more than 100 years ago by the Rockefeller Foundation who have controlled the Health sector with pharmaceuticals and particularly the cancer treatments by legislation. Here is a quote from their website:

At The Rockefeller Foundation, we’ve always tried to stay one step ahead – imagining futures that inspire bold action and making catalytic bets that can lead to long-term change. As an institution deeply rooted in science and technology, we understand their transformational power to address today’s challenges – and help plan for those we haven’t yet envisioned.

In the 1930s, Warren Weaver, who led The Rockefeller Foundation’s programs in natural sciences, had a hunch that chemical and physical explanations of life would lead to a whole new world of research and discovery. He coined the term “molecular biology” and a field was born.

In 1956, The Rockefeller Foundation supported the Dartmouth Summer Research Project on Artificial Intelligence, which was the first use of “artificial intelligence” as well. After some fits and starts, that field exploded too.

And now, artificial intelligence has combined with molecular biology to accelerate the development of vaccines and therapeutics for the world’s worst pandemic since 1918.

Could any of this have been predicted? Absolutely not. However, both molecular biology and artificial intelligence were guided by visions of positive futures where both fields contributed to improving people’s well-being.

Unfortunately, we must also plan for futures that aren’t as bright – be it due to a disease outbreak or natural disaster – to minimize harm and prepare for recovery.

In 2009, The Rockefeller Foundation conducted an exercise to explore the future of technology in development and identify ways to better respond to emerging challenges. The results were captured in a report that includes several plausible scenarios that could impact millions of people around the world. One such scenario, “Lockstep,” described a fictional pandemic that would infect 20% of the world in 2012, killing eight million people in just seven months.

Now that we’re well into a real pandemic, we see some chilling similarities between our current Zoom-centered world and Lockstep. The report predicted that telepresence technologies would “respond to the demand for less-expensive, lower bandwidth, sophisticated communications systems for populations whose travel is restricted.”

So yet another example of corporate planning!

Remember that Governments are all corporations too as well as our legal fictions which comes through our registration of birth. Nothing is as it seems through the mainstream media and we have to learn to listen to our bodies and do our own research.

Catherine Austin Fitts last year had an interesting conversation with James Corbett about how Bill Gates was using the same template he used with Microsoft and viruses, to introduce technology into our bodies

Radio Frequencies are another area of concern for the human body please read

False concepts exposed

So many doctors and scientists came together in 2020 to share their views around the science and the lies of COVID1984. In 2021Sacha Stone brings some of them together again, in a recent recording called The Death of the Germ Theory.

taken from

So Government and mass media mind control is perpetuating the myths which is very well demonstrated in the clips above.

It is not just in health, there are also whistleblowers in the police. Here is a case in point, where a cop has had enough, reproduced here

How are we today?

Since I wrote this blog I lost my YouTube channel, as I got my third strike which removed it. Fortunately my uploads were backed up on Odysee so my reflections from March Equinox are here

Here is Shunyamurti’s website

I’ve also shared this on my Light n Dark podcast on Spreaker, where I also encourage doing the inner work, because we have become a lazy society where the masses don’t tend to be critical thinkers anymore, and take their knowledge from the daily news. Why does the Government have a Behavioural Insights team? They are working on our minds!

A friend has shared links to the Peoples Lawyer videos which I hadn’t looked at prior to my recording, but there are many things in common. Here is the first part and part two is on Bitchute ; part 3 is

Part 1 – Public Health means Profitability was mentioned. In the last year since COVID19, billions have been spent, the new battle?

Part 3 – Time, energy and creativity is our value and in part three it goes into the banks version of value.

Powerful connections for the control plan

SES and Serco plan to control the world

 Michael McKibben and Douglas Gabriel on The Long Arm of British Empire & How to End it – presented by Ramola D


worldgovernance #census #iot #trackandtrace #fema #prisons #electronictagging #loki #bordercontrol #UKVisasImmigration #defence #cityoflondon #vaticancity #5G #v2s #patentcontrol #vehiclecontrol #aviation #healthnhs #microsoft #pensions #cern #transportdenmark #transporthongkong #transportmiddleeast #transportsweden …

More information from this site and

Some clips from whistleblowers, below

re 788-790 Finchley Road
John Paterson represented by Patrick Cullinane with Gordon Bowden and Field McConnell
John Paterson supporting Matthew Taylor

John Paterson who is sane, has been held in the Chichester Centre for over a year in the Pine Ward under the Mental Health Act and has been injected since that time. We understand that he will appear in court on April 26, 2021.

More information on John Paterson is recorded here

What is going on?

A scientific whistleblower Dr Astrid Stuckelberger speaks to lawyer Reiner Fuellmich


Good people are speaking out about corruption in high places. Here is a link to the video

I came across this file that I’d saved which makes some good points and I struggled to insert it so here is the link.

What really makes you ill?

David Parker and Dawn Lester came out with their book WHAT REALLY MAKES YOU ILL?why everything you thought you knew about disease is wrong after ten years of research and writing and last year they were giving lots of interviews. Their website is well worth looking at on the link above. This interview with Amandha Vollmer of YumNaturals Emporium, who made many informative videos particularly on Coronavirus last year, this one was from January this year and I’ve taken the introduction from that interview which can be found in the description of the 8 minute version on my channel here

I purchased the book last year and first of all I give thanks for the body of work produced by these authors and those who went before them in speaking out about what they observed and experienced. I’ve copied some quotes of relevance here, particularly of the history of the medical establishment and consequently the pharmaceutical takeover:

“The 16th and 17th centuries were a period during which science flourished, especially in Europe where scientific organisations such as the Royal Society, which was founded in 1660 to discuss scientific questions, were formed to provide repositories for the various writings of scientists about their work and their discoveries.

Contrary to the claims of the medical establishment, the idea that the ‘right’ dose of medicine is therapeutic but the ‘wrong’ dose is harmful, is erroneous; a substance cannot change its inherent nature in relation to the quantity in which it is used. In his book entitled Natural Hygiene: Man’s Pristine Way of Life, Herbert Shelton ND DC underlines this point succinctly in the statement that, “Poisons are such qualitatively and not merely quantitatively.” The only variations that occur due to the ‘dose’ of a poison relate to the extent of the effects it will produce and the degree of harm it will cause.

In her book entitled Death by Modern Medicine, Dr Carolyn Dean MD ND refers to the situation in Canada and states that, “Allopathic doctors began amassing power as early as 1759. At that time, legislation was drafted to protect an ‘unsuspecting public’ against quacks or ‘snake oil salesmen’.” The orthodox, or allopathic, system nevertheless employed practices that had not been scientifically established as having the ability to assist a patient’s recovery to its natural state of health; some of the unpleasant practices they used continued into the 19th century, as described by Herbert Shelton in Natural Hygiene, “…patients were bled, blistered, purged, puked, narcotized, mercurialised and alcoholised into chronic invalidism or into the grave.” Many of these ‘treatments’ were a continuation of traditional practices that date back at least to the time of Hippocrates, if not earlier. But, as stated, these treatments frequently resulted in the death of the patient; a fact that demonstrates both their lack of efficacy and their dangerous nature. The harm caused by these practices and the substances used as ‘medicine’ did not go unnoticed, as Herbert Shelton reports, “It was well known to the physicians of the period that their drugs were damaging.” The continuing use of these drugs, despite the knowledge that they were harmful, demonstrates the failure of the ‘scientific’ system to recognise the utter fallacy of the idea that ‘poisons’ can be ‘therapeutic’. The medical system in which they had been trained had not equipped physicians to provide ‘healthcare’ for their patients, nor did it protect patients from the harm caused by medical treatments. Nevertheless, the proponents of ‘scientific medicine’ sought to increase their dominance during the 19th century by further developing their system and creating more formal training procedures for the qualification of physicians. To strengthen their dominance, they also implemented the doctrine that only those physicians trained under their ‘scientific’ system would be regarded as the ‘real’ doctors, and that anyone not trained under that system would be referred to as ‘quacks’. The formalisation of the ‘medical system’ in England, for example, led to the founding of the BMA (British Medical Association) in 1832, although under a different name until 1855. The purpose of this organisation was, according to the BMA web page entitled The History of the BMA, to provide, “…a ‘friendly and scientific’ forum where doctors could advance and exchange medical knowledge.” The BMA web pages that detail its history refer to their campaign against ‘quackery’ in the early 19th century. The term ‘quackery’ was, and still is, used to discredit all forms of ‘healing’ other than those of modern medicine. Yet it was that very same 19th century medical system, which claimed to oppose quackery, that employed ‘medicines’ known to be harmful and often led to a patient’s invalidism or death. The practice of medicine has clearly not changed a great deal since the days of Hippocrates, after whom the Hippocratic Oath that urges doctors to ‘do no harm’ is named. This Oath is still sworn by newly qualified doctors and it is a laudable principle on which to base any work in the field of ‘healthcare’. But the use of harmful substances in the name of ‘healthcare’ denies physicians the ability to apply that principle in practice; as this chapter will demonstrate. Although the medical establishment continues to repudiate the idea that ‘medicines’ are harmful, with the sole exception of ‘side effects’, there have been many individual physicians who have become aware of and concerned about the problems inherent within the system in which they were trained. As a result of their investigations, many of these physicians were brave enough to reject some, if not all, of their ‘training’ and to develop and utilise other methods of ‘healing’, many of which resulted in vastly improved outcomes for their patients. One such physician was Dr John Tilden MD, who discusses his experiences in his book entitled Toxemia Explained, in which he states that, “Twenty-five years in which I used drugs, and thirty-three in which I have not used drugs, should make my belief that drugs are unnecessary, and in most cases injurious, worth something to those who care to know the truth.” Most people will probably assume that the ‘medical system’ of the early 21st century is based on solid scientific evidence, unlike the systems of earlier periods; but this would be a mistaken assumption. The system of modern medicine currently in use has been developed as the result of a variety of customs and traditions, none of which has been scientifically established to be appropriate for the treatment of a patient’s illness in order to restore them to health. Furthermore, the ‘medical science’ of the 21st century is predominantly conducted in the laboratories of pharmaceutical companies; but laboratory experimentation does not provide ‘scientific proof’ that the use of modern pharmaceutical medicines is either safe or effective. On the contrary, there is a large and growing body of evidence that demonstrates quite clearly that ‘medicines’ are not only ineffective as treatments for illness but they are also capable of producing harm and causing death.”

Therefore for the sake of your own health and the health of those nearest and dearest, it behooves you to read about these things if you want to be informed, before just following what you are told by the establishment.

Truth behind COVID vaccine

Dr Palevsky on aluminium in vaccines

It is NOT a vaccine, it is a synthetic agent

James Corbett interviews investigative journalist Whitney Webb who reveals these connections to the eugenics agenda, her website and article is here$/embed/webb-oxford/7ed84892e83ed6ce046b404a2b376766d12aa14d?r=6oo5WSR9BapK5LhuFhN9a8V2CrtiiBou

An interesting article following Dr Geert Vanden Bossche’s recent statements by Rosemary Frei

Belgian vaccine expert warns of danger for humanity Geert Vanden Bossche

Dr Sherri Tenpenny has done a lot of research on vaccines, classified as medicine – she warns that problems from the vaccinations in this recent rollout will take at least 3 months to show up and already there are many adverse events. Listen to the video below, it is very revealing! Also available here

Reinette Senum interviews Dr Tenpenny
Bio-ethics and the New Eugenics from the Corbett Report

Alison McDowell’s website